Two months ago, we posted about three Vermont-based Smart Grid stakeholders who had gone on record saying that there are no reported health effects of RF, even though there have been, by the World Health Organization, no less.
The post included a copy and paste from Central Vermont Public Service's Smart Grid Frequently Asked Questions:
18. Smart meters use radio frequencies to communicate. Have there been any studies done on the safety of this?
Yes. There have been numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies on radio frequency signals to determine if there are any health concerns. None of these studies have shown any connection between RF signals and health impacts. As studies continue, CVPS, state regulators and health officials will continue to monitor the science. We believe the new meters are completely safe for our customers and employees. They use the same types of signals used in garage door openers and baby monitors.
After suggesting, "It would be wise for CVPS, GMP, and Mr. Evslin to retract their current statements..." it appears that CVPS has done exactly that:
18. Smart meters use radio frequencies to communicate. Have there been any studies done on the safety of this?
Yes. There have been numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies on radio frequency signals to determine if there are any health concerns. In the case of the smart grid, the Federal Communications Commission regulates radio frequency signals, which are used in everything from garage door openers and baby monitors to smart meters. The FCC has judged smart meters to be completely safe for our customers and employees.
As studies continue, CVPS, state regulators and health officials will continue to monitor the science.
It was very wise for CVPS to retract those sentences to reduce their liability moving forward.
Unfortunately, Smart Meters may not actually comply with FCC guidelines, especially when collocated.
It also may be prudent for these stakeholders to seek the Underwriters Lab (UL) certification for these smart meters as that would also shield them from liability. Even if that means a slight modification of the original design specifications a safety certification would be appropriate for appliances in homes. I believe that there are some UL listed meters in existence. Or conversely, perhaps we are entitled to know why aren't these meters UL listed?
ReplyDelete